NEW RESEARCH DEMONSTRATES INEFFECTIVENESS OF MAMMOGRAMS:
As a doctor and also a woman with fibrocystic bust disease, it truly troubles me when I hear X-Ray Mammography misrepresented as precautionary medicine. X-Rays are never, shape or kind prevention. X-Ray Mammography goes to finest a form of very early discovery of breast cancer cells, but it can just find a lump after it has actually grown to a considerable dimension. Also then, X-Ray Mammography misses out on 50 percent of the growths in ladies, that have dense breasts. Considering that over 50% of premenopausal females and 25 percent of postmenopausal females have dense busts, a massive number of ladies go to danger of misdiagnosis by counting exclusively on X-Ray Mammography. This is particularly true for ladies with fibrocystic bust disease-- or for females with mark tissue in their breasts.I am directlyextremely worried regarding finding breast condition due to my family members background-- my sister died of breast cancer cells when she was 41. That's why I began getting Infrared Mammograms many years back. Unlike X-Rays, Infrared Mammography does not require call with your busts or exposure to hazardous radiation. While X-Ray Mammograms are images of the breast makeup, Infrared Mammograms are pictures of your bust metabolic rate, to make sure that even pre-cancerous swelling or tiny lumps can be detected, since they produce additional heat due to raised blood circulation.
Comments
Post a Comment